ARCH 121 (Introduction to Architecture)

Discussion about Ornament and Austerity by Adolf Loos.

Ornament and Crime.pdf

Скачать PDF • 785KB

Adolf Loos’ Ornament and Crime is such a bold argument—it’s kind of shocking how strongly he condemns ornamentation, calling it a “crime.” I get his point that modern design should focus on simplicity and functionality, especially when he talks about how ornament wastes time and labor. It makes sense that plain, efficient designs align better with industrial production. But his ideas also feel a bit extreme to me.  

Loos says that ornament is a sign of “cultural regression,” but I think in many traditions, decoration tells stories or holds symbolic meaning. Stripping that away might make things feel cold or lifeless. For example, think about traditional buildings. 

Also, the way he ties ornament to being “primitive” feels problematic. It’s like he’s saying progress means rejecting creativity or individuality, which seems unfair. I think there’s space for ornament to coexist with modern practicality if it’s done thoughtfully.